Implement basic "Field Selection Merging" rule

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -7,6 +7,9 @@ and this project adheres to
 [Haskell Package Versioning Policy](https://pvp.haskell.org/).
 
 ## [Unreleased]
+### Added
+- `Validate.Rules`:
+  - `overlappingFieldsCanBeMergedRule`
 
 ## [0.11.0.0] - 2020-11-07
 ### Changed

src/Language/GraphQL/Type/Internal.hs

@@ -15,10 +15,12 @@ module Language.GraphQL.Type.Internal
     , directives
     , doesFragmentTypeApply
     , instanceOf
+    , lookupCompositeField
     , lookupInputType
     , lookupTypeCondition
     , lookupTypeField
     , mutation
+    , outToComposite
     , subscription
     , query
     , types
@@ -160,12 +162,16 @@ lookupInputType (Full.TypeNonNull (Full.NonNullTypeList nonNull)) types'
     <$> lookupInputType nonNull types'
 
 lookupTypeField :: forall a. Full.Name -> Out.Type a -> Maybe (Out.Field a)
-lookupTypeField fieldName = \case
+lookupTypeField fieldName outputType =
-    Out.ObjectBaseType objectType ->
+    outToComposite outputType >>= lookupCompositeField fieldName
-        objectChild objectType
+
-    Out.InterfaceBaseType interfaceType ->
+lookupCompositeField :: forall a
-        interfaceChild interfaceType
+    . Full.Name
-    Out.ListBaseType listType -> lookupTypeField fieldName listType
+    -> CompositeType a
+    -> Maybe (Out.Field a)
+lookupCompositeField fieldName = \case
+    CompositeObjectType objectType -> objectChild objectType
+    CompositeInterfaceType interfaceType -> interfaceChild interfaceType
     _ -> Nothing
   where
     objectChild (Out.ObjectType _ _ _ resolvers) =
@@ -174,3 +180,12 @@ lookupTypeField fieldName = \case
         HashMap.lookup fieldName fields
     resolverType (Out.ValueResolver objectField _) = objectField
     resolverType (Out.EventStreamResolver objectField _ _) = objectField
+
+outToComposite :: forall a. Out.Type a -> Maybe (CompositeType a)
+outToComposite = \case
+    Out.ObjectBaseType objectType -> Just $ CompositeObjectType objectType
+    Out.InterfaceBaseType interfaceType ->
+        Just $ CompositeInterfaceType interfaceType
+    Out.UnionBaseType unionType -> Just $ CompositeUnionType unionType
+    Out.ListBaseType listType -> outToComposite listType
+    _ -> Nothing

src/Language/GraphQL/Validate/Rules.hs

@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ module Language.GraphQL.Validate.Rules
     , noUndefinedVariablesRule
     , noUnusedFragmentsRule
     , noUnusedVariablesRule
+    , overlappingFieldsCanBeMergedRule
     , providedRequiredInputFieldsRule
     , providedRequiredArgumentsRule
     , scalarLeafsRule
@@ -40,17 +41,17 @@ module Language.GraphQL.Validate.Rules
 
 import Control.Monad ((>=>), foldM)
 import Control.Monad.Trans.Class (MonadTrans(..))
-import Control.Monad.Trans.Reader (ReaderT(..), asks, mapReaderT)
+import Control.Monad.Trans.Reader (ReaderT(..), ask, asks, mapReaderT)
 import Control.Monad.Trans.State (StateT, evalStateT, gets, modify)
 import Data.Bifunctor (first)
-import Data.Foldable (find, toList)
+import Data.Foldable (find, foldl', toList)
 import qualified Data.HashMap.Strict as HashMap
 import Data.HashMap.Strict (HashMap)
 import Data.HashSet (HashSet)
 import qualified Data.HashSet as HashSet
 import Data.List (groupBy, sortBy, sortOn)
-import Data.Maybe (isNothing, mapMaybe)
+import Data.Maybe (fromMaybe, isNothing, mapMaybe)
-import Data.List.NonEmpty (NonEmpty)
+import Data.List.NonEmpty (NonEmpty(..))
 import Data.Ord (comparing)
 import Data.Sequence (Seq(..), (|>))
 import qualified Data.Sequence as Seq
@@ -80,6 +81,7 @@ specifiedRules =
     -- Fields
     , fieldsOnCorrectTypeRule
     , scalarLeafsRule
+    , overlappingFieldsCanBeMergedRule
     -- Arguments.
     , knownArgumentNamesRule
     , uniqueArgumentNamesRule
@@ -123,8 +125,8 @@ executableDefinitionsRule = DefinitionRule $ \case
 singleFieldSubscriptionsRule :: forall m. Rule m
 singleFieldSubscriptionsRule = OperationDefinitionRule $ \case
     Full.OperationDefinition Full.Subscription name' _ _ rootFields location' -> do
-        groupedFieldSet <- collectFields rootFields
+        groupedFieldSet <- evalStateT (collectFields rootFields) HashSet.empty
-        case length groupedFieldSet of
+        case HashSet.size groupedFieldSet of
             1 -> lift mempty
             _
                 | Just name <- name' -> pure $ Error
@@ -143,26 +145,18 @@ singleFieldSubscriptionsRule = OperationDefinitionRule $ \case
   where
     errorMessage =
         "Anonymous Subscription must select only one top level field."
-
+    collectFields selectionSet = foldM forEach HashSet.empty selectionSet
-collectFields :: forall m
-    . NonEmpty Full.Selection
-    -> ReaderT (Validation m) Seq [[Full.Field]]
-collectFields selectionSet = evalStateT go HashSet.empty
-  where
-    go = groupSorted getFieldName <$> accumulateFields [] selectionSet
-    getFieldName (Full.Field alias name _ _ _ _)
-        | Just aliasedName <- alias = aliasedName
-        | otherwise = name
-    accumulateFields = foldM forEach
     forEach accumulator = \case
         Full.FieldSelection fieldSelection -> forField accumulator fieldSelection
         Full.FragmentSpreadSelection fragmentSelection ->
             forSpread accumulator fragmentSelection
         Full.InlineFragmentSelection fragmentSelection ->
             forInline accumulator fragmentSelection
-    forField accumulator field@(Full.Field _ _ _ directives' _ _)
+    forField accumulator (Full.Field alias name _ directives' _ _)
         | any skip directives' = pure accumulator
-        | otherwise = pure $ field : accumulator
+        | Just aliasedName <- alias = pure
+            $ HashSet.insert aliasedName accumulator
+        | otherwise = pure $ HashSet.insert name accumulator
     forSpread accumulator (Full.FragmentSpread fragmentName directives' _)
         | any skip directives' = pure accumulator
         | otherwise = do
@@ -174,8 +168,14 @@ collectFields selectionSet = evalStateT go HashSet.empty
         | any skip directives' = pure accumulator
         | Just typeCondition <- maybeType =
             collectFromFragment typeCondition selections accumulator
-        | otherwise = accumulateFields accumulator selections
+        | otherwise = HashSet.union accumulator
-    collectFromFragment typeCondition selectionSet' accumulator = do
+            <$> collectFields selections
+    skip (Full.Directive "skip" [Full.Argument "if" (Full.Node argumentValue _) _] _) =
+        Full.Boolean True == argumentValue
+    skip (Full.Directive "include" [Full.Argument "if" (Full.Node argumentValue _) _] _) =
+        Full.Boolean False == argumentValue
+    skip _ = False
+    collectFromFragment typeCondition selectionSet accumulator = do
         types' <- lift $ asks $ Schema.types . schema
         schema' <- lift $ asks schema
         case Type.lookupTypeCondition typeCondition types' of
@@ -183,20 +183,15 @@ collectFields selectionSet = evalStateT go HashSet.empty
             Just compositeType
                 | Just objectType <- Schema.subscription schema'
                 , True <- Type.doesFragmentTypeApply compositeType objectType ->
-                    accumulateFields accumulator selectionSet'
+                    HashSet.union accumulator <$> collectFields selectionSet
                 | otherwise -> pure accumulator
     collectFromSpread fragmentName accumulator = do
         modify $ HashSet.insert fragmentName
         ast' <- lift $ asks ast
         case findFragmentDefinition fragmentName ast' of
             Nothing -> pure accumulator
-            Just (Full.FragmentDefinition _ typeCondition _ selectionSet' _) ->
+            Just (Full.FragmentDefinition _ typeCondition _ selectionSet _) ->
-                collectFromFragment typeCondition selectionSet' accumulator
+                collectFromFragment typeCondition selectionSet accumulator
-    skip (Full.Directive "skip" [Full.Argument "if" (Full.Node argumentValue _) _] _) =
-        Full.Boolean True == argumentValue
-    skip (Full.Directive "include" [Full.Argument "if" (Full.Node argumentValue _) _] _) =
-        Full.Boolean False == argumentValue
-    skip _ = False
 
 -- | GraphQL allows a short‐hand form for defining query operations when only
 -- that one operation exists in the document.
@@ -1026,3 +1021,187 @@ providedRequiredInputFieldsRule = ValueRule go constGo
         , Text.unpack typeName
         , "\" is required, but it was not provided."
         ]
+
+-- | If multiple field selections with the same response names are encountered
+-- during execution, the field and arguments to execute and the resulting value
+-- should be unambiguous. Therefore any two field selections which might both be
+-- encountered for the same object are only valid if they are equivalent.
+--
+-- For simple hand‐written GraphQL, this rule is obviously a clear developer
+-- error, however nested fragments can make this difficult to detect manually.
+overlappingFieldsCanBeMergedRule :: Rule m
+overlappingFieldsCanBeMergedRule = OperationDefinitionRule $ \case
+    Full.SelectionSet selectionSet _ -> do
+        schema' <- asks schema
+        go (toList selectionSet)
+            $ Type.CompositeObjectType
+            $ Schema.query schema'
+    Full.OperationDefinition operationType _ _ _ selectionSet _ -> do
+        schema' <- asks schema
+        let root = go (toList selectionSet) . Type.CompositeObjectType
+        case operationType of
+            Full.Query -> root $ Schema.query schema'
+            Full.Mutation
+                | Just objectType <- Schema.mutation schema' -> root objectType
+            Full.Subscription
+                | Just objectType <- Schema.mutation schema' -> root objectType
+            _ -> lift mempty
+  where
+    go selectionSet selectionType = do
+        fieldTuples <- evalStateT (collectFields selectionType selectionSet) HashSet.empty
+        fieldsInSetCanMerge fieldTuples
+    fieldsInSetCanMerge :: forall m
+        . HashMap Full.Name (NonEmpty (Full.Field, Type.CompositeType m))
+        -> ReaderT (Validation m) Seq Error
+    fieldsInSetCanMerge fieldTuples = do
+        validation <- ask
+        let (lonely, paired) = flattenPairs fieldTuples
+        let reader = flip runReaderT validation
+        lift $ foldMap (reader . visitLonelyFields) lonely
+            <> foldMap (reader . forEachFieldTuple) paired
+    forEachFieldTuple :: forall m
+        . (FieldInfo m, FieldInfo m)
+        -> ReaderT (Validation m) Seq Error
+    forEachFieldTuple (fieldA, fieldB) =
+        case (parent fieldA, parent fieldB) of
+            (parentA@Type.CompositeObjectType{}, parentB@Type.CompositeObjectType{})
+                | parentA /= parentB -> sameResponseShape fieldA fieldB
+            _ -> mapReaderT (checkEquality (node fieldA) (node fieldB))
+                $ sameResponseShape fieldA fieldB
+    checkEquality fieldA fieldB Seq.Empty
+        | Full.Field _ fieldNameA _ _ _ _ <- fieldA
+        , Full.Field _ fieldNameB _ _ _ _ <- fieldB
+        , fieldNameA /= fieldNameB = pure $ makeError fieldA fieldB
+        | Full.Field _ fieldNameA argumentsA _ _ locationA <- fieldA
+        , Full.Field _ _ argumentsB _ _ locationB <- fieldB
+        , argumentsA /= argumentsB =
+            let message = concat
+                    [ "Fields \""
+                    , Text.unpack fieldNameA
+                    , "\" conflict because they have different arguments. Use "
+                    , "different aliases on the fields to fetch both if this "
+                    , "was intentional."
+                    ]
+             in pure $ Error message [locationB, locationA]
+    checkEquality _ _ previousErrors = previousErrors
+    visitLonelyFields FieldInfo{..} =
+        let Full.Field _ _ _ _ subSelections _ = node
+            compositeFieldType = Type.outToComposite type'
+         in maybe (lift Seq.empty) (go subSelections) compositeFieldType
+    sameResponseShape :: forall m
+        . FieldInfo m
+        -> FieldInfo m
+        -> ReaderT (Validation m) Seq Error
+    sameResponseShape fieldA fieldB =
+        let Full.Field _ _ _ _ selectionsA _ = node fieldA
+            Full.Field _ _ _ _ selectionsB _ = node fieldB
+         in case unwrapTypes (type' fieldA) (type' fieldB) of
+            Left True -> lift mempty
+            Right (compositeA, compositeB) -> do
+                validation <- ask
+                let collectFields' composite = flip runReaderT validation
+                        . flip evalStateT HashSet.empty
+                        . collectFields composite
+                let collectA = collectFields' compositeA selectionsA
+                let collectB = collectFields' compositeB selectionsB
+                fieldsInSetCanMerge
+                    $ foldl' (HashMap.unionWith (<>)) HashMap.empty
+                    $ collectA <> collectB
+            _ -> pure $ makeError (node fieldA) (node fieldB)
+    makeError fieldA fieldB =
+        let Full.Field aliasA fieldNameA _ _ _ locationA = fieldA
+            Full.Field _ fieldNameB _ _ _ locationB = fieldB
+            message = concat
+                [ "Fields \""
+                , Text.unpack (fromMaybe fieldNameA aliasA)
+                , "\" conflict because \""
+                , Text.unpack fieldNameB
+                , "\" and \""
+                , Text.unpack fieldNameA
+                , "\" are different fields. Use different aliases on the fields "
+                , "to fetch both if this was intentional."
+                ]
+             in Error message [locationB, locationA]
+    unwrapTypes typeA@Out.ScalarBaseType{} typeB@Out.ScalarBaseType{} =
+        Left $ typeA == typeB
+    unwrapTypes typeA@Out.EnumBaseType{} typeB@Out.EnumBaseType{} =
+        Left $ typeA == typeB
+    unwrapTypes (Out.ListType listA) (Out.ListType listB) =
+        unwrapTypes listA listB
+    unwrapTypes (Out.NonNullListType listA) (Out.NonNullListType listB) =
+        unwrapTypes listA listB
+    unwrapTypes typeA typeB
+        | Out.isNonNullType typeA == Out.isNonNullType typeB
+        , Just compositeA <- Type.outToComposite typeA
+        , Just compositeB <- Type.outToComposite typeB =
+            Right (compositeA, compositeB)
+        | otherwise = Left False
+    flattenPairs :: forall m
+        . HashMap Full.Name (NonEmpty (Full.Field, Type.CompositeType m))
+        -> (Seq (FieldInfo m), Seq (FieldInfo m, FieldInfo m))
+    flattenPairs xs = HashMap.foldr splitSingleFields (Seq.empty, Seq.empty)
+        $ foldr lookupTypeField [] <$> xs
+    splitSingleFields :: forall m
+        . [FieldInfo m]
+        -> (Seq (FieldInfo m), Seq (FieldInfo m, FieldInfo m))
+        -> (Seq (FieldInfo m), Seq (FieldInfo m, FieldInfo m))
+    splitSingleFields [head'] (fields, pairList) = (fields |> head', pairList)
+    splitSingleFields xs (fields, pairList) = (fields, pairs pairList xs)
+    lookupTypeField (field, parentType) accumulator =
+        let Full.Field _ fieldName _ _ _ _ = field
+         in case Type.lookupCompositeField fieldName parentType of
+            Nothing -> accumulator
+            Just (Out.Field _ typeField _) ->
+                FieldInfo field typeField parentType : accumulator
+    pairs :: forall m
+        . Seq (FieldInfo m, FieldInfo m)
+        -> [FieldInfo m]
+        -> Seq (FieldInfo m, FieldInfo m)
+    pairs accumulator [] = accumulator
+    pairs accumulator (fieldA : fields) =
+        pair fieldA (pairs accumulator fields) fields
+    pair _ accumulator [] = accumulator
+    pair field accumulator (fieldA : fields) =
+        pair field accumulator fields |> (field, fieldA)
+    collectFields objectType = accumulateFields objectType mempty
+    accumulateFields = foldM . forEach
+    forEach parentType accumulator = \case
+        Full.FieldSelection fieldSelection ->
+            forField parentType accumulator fieldSelection
+        Full.FragmentSpreadSelection fragmentSelection ->
+            forSpread accumulator fragmentSelection
+        Full.InlineFragmentSelection fragmentSelection ->
+            forInline parentType accumulator fragmentSelection
+    forField parentType accumulator field@(Full.Field alias fieldName _ _ _ _) =
+        let key = fromMaybe fieldName alias
+            value = (field, parentType) :| []
+         in pure $ HashMap.insertWith (<>) key value accumulator
+    forSpread accumulator (Full.FragmentSpread fragmentName _ _) = do
+        inVisitetFragments <- gets $ HashSet.member fragmentName
+        if inVisitetFragments
+            then pure accumulator
+            else collectFromSpread fragmentName accumulator
+    forInline parentType accumulator = \case
+        Full.InlineFragment maybeType _ selections _
+            | Just typeCondition <- maybeType ->
+                collectFromFragment typeCondition selections accumulator
+            | otherwise -> accumulateFields parentType accumulator $ toList selections
+    collectFromFragment typeCondition selectionSet' accumulator = do
+        types' <- lift $ asks $ Schema.types . schema
+        case Type.lookupTypeCondition typeCondition types' of
+            Nothing -> pure accumulator
+            Just compositeType ->
+                accumulateFields compositeType accumulator $ toList selectionSet'
+    collectFromSpread fragmentName accumulator = do
+        modify $ HashSet.insert fragmentName
+        ast' <- lift $ asks ast
+        case findFragmentDefinition fragmentName ast' of
+            Nothing -> pure accumulator
+            Just (Full.FragmentDefinition _ typeCondition _ selectionSet' _) ->
+                collectFromFragment typeCondition selectionSet' accumulator
+
+data FieldInfo m = FieldInfo
+    { node :: Full.Field
+    , type' :: Out.Type m
+    , parent :: Type.CompositeType m
+    }

tests/Language/GraphQL/ValidateSpec.hs

@@ -663,3 +663,81 @@ spec =
                     , locations = [AST.Location 2 15]
                     }
              in validate queryString `shouldBe` [expected]
+
+        it "fails to merge fields of mismatching types" $
+            let queryString = [r|
+              {
+                dog {
+                  name: nickname
+                  name
+                }
+              }
+            |]
+                expected = Error
+                    { message =
+                        "Fields \"name\" conflict because \"nickname\" and \
+                        \\"name\" are different fields. Use different aliases \
+                        \on the fields to fetch both if this was intentional."
+                    , locations = [AST.Location 4 19, AST.Location 5 19]
+                    }
+             in validate queryString `shouldBe` [expected]
+
+        it "fails if the arguments of the same field don't match" $
+            let queryString = [r|
+              {
+                dog {
+                  doesKnowCommand(dogCommand: SIT)
+                  doesKnowCommand(dogCommand: HEEL)
+                }
+              }
+            |]
+                expected = Error
+                    { message =
+                        "Fields \"doesKnowCommand\" conflict because they have \
+                        \different arguments. Use different aliases on the \
+                        \fields to fetch both if this was intentional."
+                    , locations = [AST.Location 4 19, AST.Location 5 19]
+                    }
+             in validate queryString `shouldBe` [expected]
+
+        it "fails to merge same-named field and alias" $
+            let queryString = [r|
+              {
+                dog {
+                  doesKnowCommand(dogCommand: SIT)
+                  doesKnowCommand: isHousetrained(atOtherHomes: true)
+                }
+              }
+            |]
+                expected = Error
+                    { message =
+                        "Fields \"doesKnowCommand\" conflict because \
+                        \\"doesKnowCommand\" and \"isHousetrained\" are \
+                        \different fields. Use different aliases on the fields \
+                        \to fetch both if this was intentional."
+                    , locations = [AST.Location 4 19, AST.Location 5 19]
+                    }
+             in validate queryString `shouldBe` [expected]
+
+        it "looks for fields after a successfully merged field pair" $
+            let queryString = [r|
+              {
+                dog {
+                  name
+                  doesKnowCommand(dogCommand: SIT)
+                }
+                dog {
+                  name
+                  doesKnowCommand: isHousetrained(atOtherHomes: true)
+                }
+              }
+            |]
+                expected = Error
+                    { message =
+                        "Fields \"doesKnowCommand\" conflict because \
+                        \\"doesKnowCommand\" and \"isHousetrained\" are \
+                        \different fields. Use different aliases on the fields \
+                        \to fetch both if this was intentional."
+                    , locations = [AST.Location 5 19, AST.Location 9 19]
+                    }
+             in validate queryString `shouldBe` [expected]