summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests/Language/GraphQL/ExecuteSpec.hs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-09-28Validate arguments are definedEugen Wissner
2020-09-11Validate fragments don't form cyclesEugen Wissner
2020-07-17Constrain base monad to MonadCatchEugen Wissner
Let's try MonadThrow/MonadCatch. It looks nice at a first glance. The monad transformer stack contains only the ReaderT, less lifts are required. Exception subtyping is easier, the user can (and should) define custom error types and throw them. And it is still possible to use pure error handling, if someone doesn't like runtime exceptions or need to run a query in a pure environment. Fixes #42.
2020-07-15Respect subscriptions in the executorEugen Wissner
After the last commit there were a few places needed to be adjusted to support subscriptions. This is done and a test case is added. It is important to implement subscriptions now, because they require changes to the library API, and they are a big missing part to finish the executor. When the executor is finished, we can start to provide more stable API without breaking everything every release. Validation and introspection shouldn't require much changes to the API; AST would require some changes to report good errors after the validation - this is one thing I can think of. Fixes #5.
2020-07-14Support subscriptionsEugen Wissner
This is experimental support. The implementation is based on conduit and is boring. There is a new resolver data constructor that should create a source event stream. The executor receives the events, pipes them through the normal execution and puts them into the response stream which is returned to the user. - Tests are missing. - The executor should check field value resolver on subscription types. - The graphql function should probably return (Either ResponseEventStream Response), but I'm not sure about this. It will make the usage more complicated if no subscriptions are involved, but with the current API implementing subscriptions is more difficult than it should be.
2020-07-05Handle errors using custom typesEugen Wissner
Fixes #32.
2020-06-29Combine Resolver and ActionT in ResolverTEugen Wissner
2020-06-13Coerce resultEugen Wissner
Fixes #45.
2020-06-12Merge selection setsEugen Wissner
2020-06-10Skip unknown fieldsEugen Wissner